Edith Gap project has been approved

All things flight-related for Hang Glider and Paraglider pilots: flying plans, site info, weather, flight reports, etc. Newcomers always welcome!

Moderator: CHGPA BOD

Post Reply
jmcclave
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:24 pm

Edith Gap project has been approved

Post by jmcclave »

I heard from Cameron Seals - the USFS point of contact that we have been dealing with for the reopening of the Edith's Gap launch. The project has been approved and they will schedule the work to remove the invasive plan species and clear the launch site after October. I will talk to him to him tomorrow to get an understanding of what the USFS expects from us and I'll send a note out to the group.

Thanks,
Jim McClave
dbodner
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Edith Gap project has been approved

Post by dbodner »

Great news, Jim. Thanks for taking point on this project.
David Bodner
Dan T
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: Northern VA

Re: Edith Gap project has been approved

Post by Dan T »

Fantastic, way to go Jim.

This will open up a virtually new SE site close to home for us. It has terrific XC potential.

Dan
Pete Schumann
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 11:30 am

Re: Edith Gap project has been approved

Post by Pete Schumann »

Great work Jim and Dan.

It is a great site for those times when when we have Easterly winds with no rain. It is however not the easiest for a HG as it's a long way out to an LZ. So it's get up or go land. :mrgreen:

Thanks again guys. Let us know when we can start the launch clean up.

Pete
Dan T
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: Northern VA

Re: Edith Gap project has been approved

Post by Dan T »

Just before I started this initiative over a year ago, I stumbled into a bail out field an easy glide straight out from launch. I met the land owner who welcomed us to land there. Unfortunately it's going to be a tight fit for a high-intermediate or topless HG. However Tom once told me that he landed in it, so it can be done. The bailout LZ is plenty big enough for a PG.

There are powerlines near the crest of the hill at the launch site. In order for the site to be workable for a PG the historical slot will need to be widened at the top relative to its historical dimensions. This will enable the PG pilots to inflate their wings a bit downhill from the crest without risking interfering with the power lines and will increase the safety margin for all pilots. I mentioned this to the USFS representative when I first brought the subject up to them. They didn't have a conceptual issue with this but did ask that we minimize the removal of any large trees. We will need to make sure we have a clear understanding between both of us before we proceed.

When I last flew the site over a decade ago I managed to reach a large riverside LZ in a Mark IV with little more than buoyant air. It wasn't a flight I'd want to repeat but today's higher performing HGs should have much less difficulty reaching bigger LZs than the bailout if they don't dally after launch. Pete's advice to get up or go land is well founded even now.

On the upside the XC potential looks fantastic to me. Who will be the first to land in Cumberland?
callen
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Edith Gap project has been approved

Post by callen »

Anyone have GPS coords for this site & LZ so i can check in out on google earth?

Charlie
hang_pilot
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:13 pm
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Re: Edith Gap project has been approved

Post by hang_pilot »

callen wrote:Anyone have GPS coords for this site & LZ so i can check in out on google earth?
Charlie
Pretty sure this is the spot:

38°43'30.82"N
78°30'33.57"W

Happy google earthing,
Daniel
callen
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Edith Gap project has been approved

Post by callen »

Thanks
Post Reply