Hangin' Saddam
Moderator: CHGPA BOD
- mchevalier
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 12:59 am
- Location: Salida CO
Hangin' Saddam
See the video of it here. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=863ce7d4a3
Hanging was way too humane for Saddam....he should have been slowly fed through one of his wood chippers (that he and his henchmen used on his political opposition) and his remains fed to swine....but that's just my opinion.
On a partisan note, it needs to be reiterated that Saddam and his two sons would still be running Iraq if Gore (or Kerry) had won their elections. Good riddance to all these losers
Thank God for the good sense of the American public for choosing W twice as their commander in chief in these perilous times.
Marco
On a partisan note, it needs to be reiterated that Saddam and his two sons would still be running Iraq if Gore (or Kerry) had won their elections. Good riddance to all these losers
Thank God for the good sense of the American public for choosing W twice as their commander in chief in these perilous times.
Marco
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:40 pm
- Location: Cumberland, MD
If Kerry had been elected (or Gore, although he probably was) and Saddam was still in power, there would be more stability in the Middle East, Iran would have a mortal enemy next door to counter-balance their global aspirations, there would be 3000 more American soldiers alive and tens of thousands more without terrible wounds and life-altering injuries, we'd have another trillion dollars to spend on health care, student loans, social security, and to balance the budget, there would be fewer Islamic terrorists, and the U.S would still have some honor and prestige in the eyes of the global community.Marco Zee wrote:On a partisan note, it needs to be reiterated that Saddam and his two sons would still be running Iraq if Gore (or Kerry) had won their elections. Good riddance to all these losers
Thank God for the good sense of the American public for choosing W twice as their commander in chief in these perilous times.
Marco
I don't know you Marco, but after reading your posts here on this list, I can honestly say that I believe that's a good thing. Being from West Virginia, I already know too many redneck idiots.
JR
-
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:17 pm
Don't mind Marco, JR--he's our resident Dr Strangelove--Or How I Learned To Hate Everyone That's Not a Neo-Con.theflyingdude wrote:If Kerry had been elected (or Gore, although he probably was) and Saddam was still in power, there would be more stability in the Middle East, Iran would have a mortal enemy next door to counter-balance their global aspirations, there would be 3000 more American soldiers alive and tens of thousands more without terrible wounds and life-altering injuries, we'd have another trillion dollars to spend on health care, student loans, social security, and to balance the budget, there would be fewer Islamic terrorists, and the U.S would still have some honor and prestige in the eyes of the global community.Marco Zee wrote:On a partisan note, it needs to be reiterated that Saddam and his two sons would still be running Iraq if Gore (or Kerry) had won their elections. Good riddance to all these losers
Thank God for the good sense of the American public for choosing W twice as their commander in chief in these perilous times.
Marco
I don't know you Marco, but after reading your posts here on this list, I can honestly say that I believe that's a good thing. Being from West Virginia, I already know too many redneck idiots.
JR
marc
Great Googly-moo!
If Kerry had been elected (or Gore, although he probably was) and Saddam was still in power, there would be more stability in the Middle East, Iran would have a mortal enemy next door to counter-balance their global aspirations, there would be 3000 more American soldiers alive and tens of thousands more without terrible wounds and life-altering injuries, we'd have another trillion dollars to spend on health care, student loans, social security, and to balance the budget, there would be fewer Islamic terrorists, and the U.S would still have some honor and prestige in the eyes of the global community. JR
Hey JR,
Thanks for agreeing with my assessment that Gore would NOT have invaded Iraq and Kerry would have immediately surrendered (a la the French) and reinstated Saddam as Iraqi President, so there could be "more stability" in the Middle East, and of course more honor and prestige for the USA. Either way, Saddam would still be alive and ruling in Iraq instead of pushing daisies.
I guess you are right...Saddam ruling Iraq today is obviously much better than the current situation in Iraq. Good grief.
The rest of your remarks are typical, inaccurate, liberal tripe, hyperbole,and dillusional thinking. Don't let your redneck idiot neighbors hear ya talking like that....they might not handle it too well and may take action to teach ya a lesson "in politics"....gotta love those gun-toting, pickup truck driving guys . Of course, because I hate anyone who's not a neo-con, that works for me.
Marco
Hey JR,
Thanks for agreeing with my assessment that Gore would NOT have invaded Iraq and Kerry would have immediately surrendered (a la the French) and reinstated Saddam as Iraqi President, so there could be "more stability" in the Middle East, and of course more honor and prestige for the USA. Either way, Saddam would still be alive and ruling in Iraq instead of pushing daisies.
I guess you are right...Saddam ruling Iraq today is obviously much better than the current situation in Iraq. Good grief.
The rest of your remarks are typical, inaccurate, liberal tripe, hyperbole,and dillusional thinking. Don't let your redneck idiot neighbors hear ya talking like that....they might not handle it too well and may take action to teach ya a lesson "in politics"....gotta love those gun-toting, pickup truck driving guys . Of course, because I hate anyone who's not a neo-con, that works for me.
Marco
-
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:17 pm
Oooooh--you's so tuff mr. big boy! I get all tingly excited when you talk that way--you manly man of men! I'd love a picture of you and your GW blow-up love doll together.Marco Zee wrote:If Kerry had been elected (or Gore, although he probably was) and Saddam was still in power, there would be more stability in the Middle East, Iran would have a mortal enemy next door to counter-balance their global aspirations, there would be 3000 more American soldiers alive and tens of thousands more without terrible wounds and life-altering injuries, we'd have another trillion dollars to spend on health care, student loans, social security, and to balance the budget, there would be fewer Islamic terrorists, and the U.S would still have some honor and prestige in the eyes of the global community. JR
Hey JR,
Thanks for agreeing with my assessment that Gore would NOT have invaded Iraq and Kerry would have immediately surrendered (a la the French) and reinstated Saddam as Iraqi President, so there could be "more stability" in the Middle East, and of course more honor and prestige for the USA. Either way, Saddam would still be alive and ruling in Iraq instead of pushing daisies.
I guess you are right...Saddam ruling Iraq today is obviously much better than the current situation in Iraq. Good grief.
The rest of your remarks are typical, inaccurate, liberal tripe, hyperbole,and dillusional thinking. Don't let your redneck idiot neighbors hear ya talking like that....they might not handle it too well and may take action to teach ya a lesson "in politics"....gotta love those gun-toting, pickup truck driving guys . Of course, because I hate anyone who's not a neo-con, that works for me.
Marco
marc
Great Googly-moo!
OK Marc,
I'll put you down with JR as believing that Iraq, the Middle East, and the USA would be much better off with Saddam and his two sons once again running Iraq today. Your brilliance never ceases to amaze me.
Does anyone else want to climb on the Saddam-is-better-than-Democracy Bandwagon?
Marc, perhaps you can donate one of your artistic masterpieces to the Saddam Presidential Library as a small token of your appreciation of his contributions to world peace and human rights.
Marco
I'll put you down with JR as believing that Iraq, the Middle East, and the USA would be much better off with Saddam and his two sons once again running Iraq today. Your brilliance never ceases to amaze me.
Does anyone else want to climb on the Saddam-is-better-than-Democracy Bandwagon?
Marc, perhaps you can donate one of your artistic masterpieces to the Saddam Presidential Library as a small token of your appreciation of his contributions to world peace and human rights.
Marco
-
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:17 pm
Careful there, bubba--I've never called into question your presumed surgical skills despite ample evidence of questionable judgement.Marco Zee wrote:OK Marc,
Marc, perhaps you can donate one of your artistic masterpieces to the Saddam Presidential Library as a small token of your appreciation of his contributions to world peace and human rights.
Marco
marc
Great Googly-moo!