Marco Zemora Diagnosis

For topics that don't fit into any of the other forums: politics, rant-n-raves, cool web sites, anything and everything goes!

Moderator: CHGPA BOD

Post Reply
Flying Lobster
Posts: 1042
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:17 pm

Marco Zemora Diagnosis

Post by Flying Lobster »

Two words:

Sociopath sycophant

You need to see a doctor--now.

marc
Great Googly-moo!
Marco Zee
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 12:11 am
Location: Bel Air

Post by Marco Zee »

I guess when you run out of liberal trash to spout, your resort to your old name-calling tricks again. Boring. Your childish posts and replies are beneath the dignity of this forum and are contemptable and inexcusable.

What did I post that even comes close to be sociopathic???

Do you even know what those words mean?

If you were a real doctor or psychiatrist, you would be guilty of gross malpractice...but i guess since you been in psychotherapy yourself for so many years that that qualifies you as an authority on sociopaths.

Do you know what the word SLANDER means??? You may want to look that one up.

So I'll ask again, what did I post that is sociopathic ??? Anyone?
brianvh
Posts: 1437
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 2:32 pm
Location: manhattan, New York

Post by brianvh »

Uh, that was a little out of the blue, Marc.
Brian Vant-Hull
theflyingdude
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:40 pm
Location: Cumberland, MD

Post by theflyingdude »

Marco Zee wrote:Do you know what the word SLANDER means??? You may want to look that one up.
Actually, Marco, you may want to look that one up yourself since you apparently don't know what it means. The word you want is "libel" since Marc [Panties Dude]'s comments were in written form.

More from the good doctor:

"He knew who I was, at that time, because I had a reputation as a writer. I knew he was part of the Bush dynasty. But he was nothing, he offered nothing, and he promised nothing. He had no humor. He was insignificant in every way and consequently I didn't pay much attention to him. But when he passed out in my bathtub, then I noticed him. I'd been in another room, talking to the bright people. I had to have him taken away." -on meeting George W Bush at Thompson's Super Bowl party in Houston in 1974

"Richard Nixon looks like a flaming liberal today, compared to a golem like George Bush. Indeed. Where is Richard Nixon now that we finally need him?"

"Richard Nixon has never been one of my favorite people anyway. For years I've regarded his existence as a monument to all the rancid genes and broken chromosones that corrupt the possibilities of the American Dream; he was a foul caricature of himself, a man with no soul, no inner convictions, with the integrity of a hyena and the style of a poison toad. The Nixon I remembered was absolutely humorless; I couldn't imagine him laughing at anything except maybe a paraplegic who wanted to vote Democratic but couldn't quite reach the lever on the voting machine."

"Every GOP administration since 1952 has let the Military-Industrial Complex loot the Treasury and plunge the nation into debt on the excuse of a wartime economic emergency. Richard Nixon comes quickly to mind, along with Ronald Reagan and his ridiculous 'trickle-down' theory of U.S. economic policy. If the Rich get Richer, the theory goes, before long their pots will overflow and somehow 'trickle down' to the poor, who would rather eat scraps off the Bush family plates than eat nothing at all. Republicans have never approved of democracy, and they never will. It goes back to preindustrial America, when only white male property owners could vote."

"America... just a nation of two hundred million used car salesmen with all the money we need to buy guns and no qualms about killing anybody else in the world who tries to make us uncomfortable."

"I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me."


- HST
Flying Lobster
Posts: 1042
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:17 pm

Post by Flying Lobster »

Marco Zee wrote:I guess when you run out of liberal trash to spout, your resort to your old name-calling tricks again. Boring. Your childish posts and replies are beneath the dignity of this forum and are contemptable and inexcusable.

What did I post that even comes close to be sociopathic???

Do you even know what those words mean?

If you were a real doctor or psychiatrist, you would be guilty of gross malpractice...but i guess since you been in psychotherapy yourself for so many years that that qualifies you as an authority on sociopaths.

Do you know what the word SLANDER means??? You may want to look that one up.

So I'll ask again, what did I post that is sociopathic ??? Anyone?
I have no problem at all obliging your request. Are we getting nasty now--yes.

You are knowingly entering your insipid posts on a "anything goes" forum. Read the fine print--and good luck with your threats of libel (of course, nothing slanderous in what you say about me, right? hah hah).

You exhibit sociopathic behavior in your sweeping condemnation of mass classes of people and cultures you don't know a fucking thing about. You sit in your rich comfortable little world and rattle your pretend sword by towing the ultra-conservative party hate-line. You have consistently denigrated foriegn cutures (French, Arabs etc) and have insinuated that anyone that doesn't agree with murderous policies of the administration are traitorous by aiding and abetting the enemy. Your anti-Clinton rhetoric borders on delusional--you somehow feel that everything wrong in the world is somehow attributable to someone who is not in power and excersises no power or policies on world events.

You are a sycophant in that your constant adulation of the administration and its policies is absolute, unquestioning and you obviously derive joy and comfort suckling on the teat of hate while imagining yourself as some kind of pretend warrior defending the freedom of the world.

You talk about war and death as if it's some kind of armchair game. Get your ass to Iraq, you pretend warrior doc.

marc :evil:
Great Googly-moo!
deveil
Posts: 1336
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: garyD - Falls Church, Va

Post by deveil »

perhaps an alternative?
there was that perrenially popular developmental course...what was it called?
'how to win friends and influence enemies'...something like that.

not that it ever did Me any good.
but then again - i never did take it.
they kept saying stuff about me needing prerequisites.
something about kindergarten or something.
i told them to go take a flying f*** at a rolling donut, motherf***ers!

then they says something like i should be grateful for the advice.
can you imagine!
'told em to kiss my royal motherf***ing ass! just kiss it!
damn!
busted a cap in their f***ing asses, that's what I did!

told the cops, hey!
you don't agree with me ?
well then you just damn well must not understand the situation, ya mah-fuk-kers!!

learned that line from the 'pres' (you know - the u.s. pres, my man bushy)
there's a man knows how to handle hisself.
sets the right tone, you know what i'm saying.

BRING IT ON, BABY!
JUST YOU GO AHEAD AND BRING IT!

damn ararogant mah-fuk-kers.
i'm a peaceful dude.
know what i mean.
garyDevan
deveil
Posts: 1336
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: garyD - Falls Church, Va

Post by deveil »

oh.
while you got that dictionary open?
(i believe you were researching 'slander' ?)

read up on 'satire' ( it should be nearby)
you satirized sycophantic sociopathic sick-o, you :lol:
(nothing personal, you understand. i just like alliteration. :lol: )

oh yeah,
mustn't forget another inapproriately placed smiley face! :lol:
i mean, good grief, that changes everything!
(again with the satire :lol: )
marco wrote: bye Gary, you Nazi you :lol:
garyDevan
Marco Zee
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 12:11 am
Location: Bel Air

Post by Marco Zee »

As I suspected, Marc's knowledge of psychiatric terms is even more paltry than his knowledge of politics and world events.

http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/An ... y_disorder

Antisocial personality disorder
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - Cite This Source


Antisocial personality disorder (abbreviated APD or ASPD) is a psychiatric diagnosis in the DSM-IV-TR recognizable by the disordered individual's impulsive behavior, disregard for social norms, and indifference to the rights and feelings of others. The closely related concept psychopathy, which should not be confused with psychosis, covers a generally more severe personality disorder. The World Health Organization's ICD-10 diagnostic manual uses dissocial personality disorder instead. The term sociopathy, although having no current diagnostic criteria, is also sometimes used.

Explanation
Diagnosis of Antisocial personality disorder is significantly more common among men than among women .
Central to understanding individuals diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder, is that they appear to experience a limited range of human emotions. This can explain their lack of empathy for the suffering of others, since they cannot experience the emotion associated with either empathy or suffering. Risk-seeking behavior and substance abuse may be attempts to escape feeling empty or emotionally void. The rage exhibited by psychopaths and the anxiety associated with certain types of antisocial personality disorder may represent the limit of emotion experienced, or there may be physiological responses without analogy to emotion experienced by others.

Research has shown that individuals with antisocial personality disorder are indifferent to the possibility of physical pain or many punishments, and show no indications that they experience fear when so threatened. This may explain their apparent disregard for the consequences of their actions, and their aforementioned lack of empathy.

Establishing the diagnosis
Antisocial personality disorder and the closely related construct of psychopathy can be assessed and diagnosed through clinical interview, self-rating personality surveys, and ratings from coworkers and family. For diagnosing psychopathy in forensic male populations, the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) is considered definitive.
Diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV-TR)
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV, a widely used manual for diagnosing mental and behavioral disorders, defines antisocial personality disorder as a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since age 15, as indicated by three (or more) of the following:

1. failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
2. deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
3. impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
4. irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated fights or assaults (both physically or mentally)
5. reckless disregard for safety of self or others
6. consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain steady work or honor financial obligations
7. lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another

The manual lists the following additional necessary criteria:


The individual is at least 18 years of age.
There is evidence of conduct disorder with onset before age 15 years.
The occurrence of antisocial behavior is not exclusively during the course of Schizophrenia or a Manic Episode.

Mnemonic
A mnemonic that can be used to remember the criteria for antisocial personality disorder is CORRUPT:

C - cannot follow law
O - obligations ignored
R - remorselessness
R - recklessness
U - underhandedness
P - planning deficit
T - temper


I know Gary is going to have a field day with this one. Sorry Marc, you are proven wrong once again.....this is just toooo easy.

THE DEFENSE RESTS.....
deveil
Posts: 1336
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: garyD - Falls Church, Va

Post by deveil »

diagnosis?
i swear, i'm back to thinking this is marcF doing a 'borat' schtik.
garyDevan
deveil
Posts: 1336
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: garyD - Falls Church, Va

Post by deveil »

marco wrote: Post subject: USA is a Nazi Monster
Regardless of his true identity, are none of our house liberals going to agree with or renounce the gist of theflyingdude's post?
or is he a 'narc' ?
trolling the net, looking to entrap someone with a zealots distorted sense of patriotism? (it IS getting weird out there!)
like one of those guys who sits in a camp chair in a field at the canadian border, looking for terrorists with field glasses?
or spends his free time 'patroling' the mexican border via the internet, trying to nab illegal immigrants?

i mean, really?
am i the only one who thinks something doesn't add up right and finds this guy spooky?

i mean, just interested, you know...before i ask my doctor to increase my meds.
garyDevan
deveil
Posts: 1336
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: garyD - Falls Church, Va

Post by deveil »

uh...nevermind.

these guys just came by and set me straight.
you know, 'helped me get my mind right'.

marco is, indeed, real - a real patriot , as a matter of fact.
and i for one support him and his efforts to help our country and our american way of life.
he and others like him are what keep this country strong.

we should all renounce those who in any way impeed, criticize, belittle, scorn,
doubt, have doubts, disagree, question, make look bad, give the finger to, or...uhm, there was one more...oh, yeah...tell a sitting vice president to go 'f' himself.

the caravan of black chevy suburbans just left. they're really nice guys, really. i recommend you welcome them freely in to your homes.
they even left this fat govenment contract to, as they put it, "show their appreciation" and "make me one of the team". said they'd even try to get me on as the moderator of this forum, and support me as club president if i wanted!

shoot, i feel sort of silly now, thinking that there was anything to worry about.
'think globally, act locally'!
them eco-terrorists may be evil but they aren't dumb and they got good slogans!

your work is done here, marco.
no need to come back.
i'm on board and got this little corner of the war on terrorism covered.

is this a great country or what!
garyDevan
deveil
Posts: 1336
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: garyD - Falls Church, Va

Post by deveil »

okay, now that we have That all taken care of,
can we get back to the issue which unites us all?
what's that, you say?
state the obvious, you say?
well... if i must, i must.

G.W. BUSH IS A FRIGGIN' SCHMUCK !

don't like that?
well renounce me, denounce me, take my words - throw them down - pound them till they scream - smear them all over me - then get the f*** out!
(oh... wait a minute... that was the slogan on a t-shirt of a gal i knew from N.Y. city :shock: - oh, what the heck, they seem relevant. 8) )
freedom of speech!
take advantage of it while it lasts!

(just don't tell my mom :shock: )
garyDevan
deveil
Posts: 1336
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: garyD - Falls Church, Va

Post by deveil »

hey narco -err, i mean marco,
you know those signs on the highways between baltimore and d.c. ?
the ones telling you to report 'suspicious behavior' ? (you Do know that it's special guys like you they're talking to, dontcha?)
well, just curious.
how many times have you called something in?
you can tell me.
after all, yous is the good guys, the CHOSEN, the RIGHTEOUS, the ones ready and willing to take up arms against anyone deemed to be the enemy (well, not anyone, otherwise you'd be, you know, 'over there'), the guys to call on, worldwide, for any kind of cleansing - ethnic, tribal, religous, political or otherwise. yous guys got nothing to worry about, right? and anybody that's worried, well, that there is pretty much an admission of guilt, isn't it? throw them witches in the river you say. if they drown they were guilty, or was it if they floated they were guilty? in which case you burned them. any way you looked at it, once you were called a witch, you were dead.
circular arguments. ever heard of the em? that's why we're chasing our tails in the middle east, that's why there HAS to be wmd's, why this HAS to have been the right thing to have done - because it IS what we're DOING, and it looks like an impossibility to STOP doing it.
chasing your tail? you guys are more like a dog , chasing its tail and a car at the same time, in the middle of the friggin beltway. all the while maintainig, " i may not have caught anything yet, but if i stop, it's gauranteed that i won't catch anything!" "if YOU'RE so smart, YOU come up with a plan! ", you say.
unfortunately, we all ended up out there with you. but then, that WAS your plan.
now nobody has much of a choice but to keep running, because if we stop, not only will YOU not catch anything, but WE'LL ALL get run over.
perhaps this is why ,
hunter s. thompson wrote:
...I am too old to worry about whether they like it or not. Fuck them!
garyDevan
deveil
Posts: 1336
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: garyD - Falls Church, Va

Post by deveil »

come on marco,
you're not keeping up - and i need a scapegoat.

it's just as well.
i gotta quit watching the news anyhow.
hearing about all of us and them getting blown up, with no way out... it just pisses me off.

but if you want to say something inane,
go ahead... before shrub uses up all the stupidest lines in his 'state of delusion' address.

i'll be here for you.
garyDevan
deveil
Posts: 1336
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: garyD - Falls Church, Va

Post by deveil »

..........................................

'musta been a narc.
garyDevan
Post Reply