???? A gamble, but I'm willing to take it.
???????????????????????????????? Bacil
Pulpit 1/28
Moderator: CHGPA BOD
At the moment, conditions for the Pulpit seem pretty
encouraging!
W@10-15 for McC, according to the NWS text 'cast.
W@10 at 2:00pm according to the NWS hourly weather chart.
W@15-20kts at 3000 according to ADDS.
If conditions tomorrow look even close to any of this,
then I'm Pulpit bound!
Mark C.
mobile: 301-807-5414
encouraging!
W@10-15 for McC, according to the NWS text 'cast.
W@10 at 2:00pm according to the NWS hourly weather chart.
W@15-20kts at 3000 according to ADDS.
If conditions tomorrow look even close to any of this,
then I'm Pulpit bound!
Mark C.
mobile: 301-807-5414
-
Flying Lobster
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 4:17 pm
PULPIT-PULPIT-PULPIT
Ahh! Wishful thinking. Good luck with that.
Matthew
Matthew
Pulpit 1/28
Just so you have a correct head-count for wire crew, Matthew has
agreed to observe me in a PG at Daniel's. Have a good flight! - Hugh
agreed to observe me in a PG at Daniel's. Have a good flight! - Hugh
I see all kinds of great W forecasts, but I'm not sure
I believe them. UCAR's surface obs map shows SW
and S everywhere.
The High to our south *has* been headed further south
over the past 6 hours, but I don't see any hints of a
wrap-around that would give us some W up here.
So I'm not very encouraged about the Pulpit : anyone
see something different?
I *may* head to Daniels, if I'm really bored
A 5-10 'cast often translates to sled for hangies down
there.
Mark C.
301-807-5414
I believe them. UCAR's surface obs map shows SW
and S everywhere.
The High to our south *has* been headed further south
over the past 6 hours, but I don't see any hints of a
wrap-around that would give us some W up here.
So I'm not very encouraged about the Pulpit : anyone
see something different?
I *may* head to Daniels, if I'm really bored
A 5-10 'cast often translates to sled for hangies down
there.
Mark C.
301-807-5414
Pulpit 1/28
I think I'm going south. Hope I won't be the only HG down there.
On Jan 28, 2006, at 8:49 AM, markc wrote:
>
> I see all kinds of great W forecasts, but I'm not sure
> I believe them. UCAR's surface obs map shows SW
> and S everywhere.
>
> The High to our south *has* been headed further south
> over the past 6 hours, but I don't see any hints of a
> wrap-around that would give us some W up here.
>
> So I'm not very encouraged about the Pulpit : anyone
> see something different?
>
> I *may* head to Daniels, if I'm really bored
> A 5-10 'cast often translates to sled for hangies down
> there.
>
> Mark C.
> 301-807-5414
On Jan 28, 2006, at 8:49 AM, markc wrote:
>
> I see all kinds of great W forecasts, but I'm not sure
> I believe them. UCAR's surface obs map shows SW
> and S everywhere.
>
> The High to our south *has* been headed further south
> over the past 6 hours, but I don't see any hints of a
> wrap-around that would give us some W up here.
>
> So I'm not very encouraged about the Pulpit : anyone
> see something different?
>
> I *may* head to Daniels, if I'm really bored
> A 5-10 'cast often translates to sled for hangies down
> there.
>
> Mark C.
> 301-807-5414
Pulpit 1/28
Brian,
???? That was the main reason I went to the Pulpit, the fact that plenty of isobars were lining up west/WNW to east/ESE from PA to New England on Saturday.? That information was available Friday afternoon from the Weather Channel website.? Once I saw that the choice was easy, helped out by years of observation of similar forecasts and the actual results.
??????????????????????????????????????????????? Bacil
???? That was the main reason I went to the Pulpit, the fact that plenty of isobars were lining up west/WNW to east/ESE from PA to New England on Saturday.? That information was available Friday afternoon from the Weather Channel website.? Once I saw that the choice was easy, helped out by years of observation of similar forecasts and the actual results.
??????????????????????????????????????????????? Bacil