Re[2]: No more cliff launch

All things flight-related for Hang Glider and Paraglider pilots: flying plans, site info, weather, flight reports, etc. Newcomers always welcome!

Moderator: CHGPA BOD

Post Reply
User avatar
rs54263
Posts: 199
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:35 pm

Re[2]: No more cliff launch

Post by rs54263 »

I think that what Rich was referring to was that HR did have a wooden
launch deck at one time; but it was burned down by some of HR's
non-flying "visitors". It was then replaced with the concrete deck
that we have today.

I'm not sure - this would have been way before my time; do I have my
[ancient] history correct here?

~Ralph

================================================================
from: Hugh McElrath (01/07/2006 07:58)
================================================================

LMAO? Would it be sufficient if the frame were metal (like on the
ramps at Pulpit) and the decking were wood? Have to get Washington
County to permit it... - Hugh
Danny Brotto
Posts: 709
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 9:29 pm

Ancient History?

Post by Danny Brotto »

Ancient history? I'm now feeling old LOL.

The previous wooden ramp was torched on 4th of July (some ancient years ago.) The county allowed us to "landscape" another ramp so that it could not be torched again. The entire plan and authorization took almost 6 months. After the first round of concrete was poured, complete with reinforcing rebar, the county was unhappy with the "construction" and made us remove the rebar. They were emphatic about using rocks to do landscaping and to not have a constructed structure. We manually chiseled and pounded the concrete to remove the rebar. Rocks were retrieve from the woods and filled into the area. We took pictures of the rocks and then put on a ?thin? layer of ?material? to help hold the rocks together LOL. New concrete was poured, actually in 5 gallon buckets that were manually carrier up to the cube from the set-up area. I have a DVD that Fred Permenter from old VHS tapes showing much of the ordeal. It was a lot of work both political (with the county) and manual.

Danny Brotto
Richard Hays
Posts: 315
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:13 am
Location: Baltimore, Maryland

Re[2]: No more cliff launch

Post by Richard Hays »

Right on; Ralph, Danny, Tom and everyone else who got my "drift" regarding a
"new" ramp at High Rock. Wish it was as easy as saying "lets build a radial
ramp". LOL. History tells a different story. We're lucky we have what we
have there at all.

And...I think that in our overall group conciousness..we should continue to
try to keep High Rock as our premier local site meaning; fly it as often as
humanly possible. It truly is a fantastic place to fly, thermal and ridge
soar. Not to mention the pretty damn good LZ complete with pavillion and
landowners who dig us. And....basically one hour from Baltimore and
Washington? HELLO....!!! What more do ya' want?

And... Emma needs cash and we need to keep our presence up there. Atop is a
awesome spectator site and excellent PR arena for the sport..unlike any
other site around the immediate vicinity. And I agree that in ( most )
conditions, High Rock is not only the epitomy of Foot Launch hanggliding,
but also one of the easier mountain launches...given the use of a proper
crew.

High Rock is full of history, adrenaline, and fun ( although a slot launch
would kinda be cool ). And...whether you like paragliding or not...a slot
would be a better alternative to a radial ramp and...open HR up as a premier
hanggliding AND paragliding site which....( again..like it or not ) would
help sustain the site for years to come due to revenues and usage. My site
improvement vote is for some tree removal to create an alternative launch.
But this too is an old discussion.

Either way...High Rock is a gem among gems.

Rich


>From: "Ralph Sickinger (R2)" <rps@sickinger.net>
>Reply-To: hg_forum@chgpa.org
>To: hg_forum@chgpa.org
>Subject: Re[2]: No more cliff launch
>Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 12:18:11 -0500
>
>I think that what Rich was referring to was that HR did have a wooden
>launch deck at one time; but it was burned down by some of HR's
>non-flying "visitors". It was then replaced with the concrete deck
>that we have today.
>
>I'm not sure - this would have been way before my time; do I have my
>[ancient] history correct here?
>
>~Ralph
>
>================================================================
>from: Hugh McElrath (01/07/2006 07:58)
>================================================================
>
>LMAO? Would it be sufficient if the frame were metal (like on the
>ramps at Pulpit) and the decking were wood? Have to get Washington
>County to permit it... - Hugh
>
>
>
>
>
>
bustedwing2
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:58 pm
Location: McConnellsburg,Pa

Post by bustedwing2 »

I've only flown High Rock in light to moderate conditions and consider it to be an "easy" launch,but my first mountain flights were at Lookout which is very similar so I'm probably prejudiced to a pad and 2 steps and yer off.RichB
mcelrah
Posts: 2323
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:30 pm

Re[2]: No more cliff launch

Post by mcelrah »

Richard said: "What more do you want?"
A hangar where I can keep my glider set up. (And a way to transport
it in that condition back to launch - how about a funicular?) A
fully stocked bar in the pavilion of the LZ. Hot tub, masseuse,
condo... - Hugh
User avatar
jimrooney
Posts: 583
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:25 am
Location: Queenstown, New Zealand
Contact:

Post by jimrooney »

NO NO NO! Frekin lasers!
LASERS!
I want frekin LASERS! Is that so hard?
hepcat1989
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:15 pm

Post by hepcat1989 »

I wonder if Lookout Mt. has had a bunch of blown launches there.Maybe the reason to revamp their ramp? I'll try and find out.
Shawn.
Post Reply