Woodstock primary LZ may be compromissed!!!!!

All things flight-related for Hang Glider and Paraglider pilots: flying plans, site info, weather, flight reports, etc. Newcomers always welcome!

Moderator: CHGPA BOD

Post Reply
wmelo
Posts: 669
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:00 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, VA, USA

Woodstock primary LZ may be compromissed!!!!!

Post by wmelo »

As you may know, the owners of Woodstock primary LZ sold their property. They may move by end of November. The new owner is William Parsons. I do not have his contact information. However, the club may (if they have not already done so) try to contact him. According to the current owner, he does not look like to be very friendly :(

I hope the club will be able to keep the primary LZ open...it will be terrible if we loose this LZ
Walt Melo
walt.melo [at] gmail [dot] com
+1.804.walt.743
User avatar
silverwings
Posts: 1243
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:29 pm
Location: Bethesda, MD
Contact:

Re: Woodstock primary LZ may be compromissed!!!!!

Post by silverwings »

This was from Gary regarding flying there on Wednesday and about the LZ:
Fantastic day. Got a couple hrs. and saw a few bald eagles and some hawks. Plus got
paid for mileage to drive to a machine shop just south of Woodstock. Still corn in the
bridge field so landed in primary. The care taker of the farm (as you mentioned) said we
probably have limited time to land there. Mr. Fishburns daughter sold the entire farm.
Settlement is scheduled second wk in Nov. New owner plans to build a new house somewhere
in or near the LZ.
john middleton (202)409-2574 c
XCanytime
Posts: 2620
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:45 pm

Re: Woodstock primary LZ may be compromissed!!!!!

Post by XCanytime »

This is not good. Sounds like we better get a "permanent" agreement with the bridge field landowners ASAP. Bacil
User avatar
mingram
Posts: 987
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:46 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Re: Woodstock primary LZ may be compromissed!!!!!

Post by mingram »

Definitely unfortunate news. The realtor contacted me and explained that the contract requires the sellers to send a certified letter revoking our permission to land there. Once settled the realtor will forward me the contact information of the new owners who we would have to negotiate a new deal with. Hopefully the new house isn't in the middle of the LZ and hopefully they're amenable to working out a deal.

As far as the bridge field, does anyone have contact info for that owner?
Matt Ingram
CHGPA President
P4 Observer
804.399.5155
mingram@vt.edu
thermalup
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:25 pm
Location: Jim Gibson, currently located in NW Michigan but slowly moving to VA during the next couple of years
Contact:

Re: Woodstock primary LZ may be compromissed!!!!!

Post by thermalup »

This is disturbing news even for an annual spring visitor like myself.
Was the CHGPA aware that that the property was for sale?
I am guessing acreage in the Shenandoah Valley is priced in big $$$ but if the club ever has an opportunity to purchase 'the bridge field' perhaps pilots across the US would be willing to donate to such a worthy cause. Please sign me up if you need a donation for a Woodstock LZ purchase or leasing.
User avatar
mingram
Posts: 987
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:46 pm
Location: Washington, DC

Re: Woodstock primary LZ may be compromissed!!!!!

Post by mingram »

We just found out a week ago because some members have been trying to buy property in the area.
Matt Ingram
CHGPA President
P4 Observer
804.399.5155
mingram@vt.edu
mcelrah
Posts: 2323
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:30 pm

Re: Woodstock primary LZ may be compromissed!!!!!

Post by mcelrah »

Also, the fields off to the right are huge and actually on the same side of the river. There is a cable across the road/driveway but if you land a HG in the nearer field, it's not a bad carry out to where the cable is. I have landed there on PG and once spoke with a couple middle-aged women from the houses. I chatted them up about was it OK to land there, they were noncommittal, I mentioned site insurance but didn't follow up. - Hugh
Post Reply