Yeah, talk about self-censoring. The 'Oh cr@p!' that we were all about to let-loose with was bottled up as the kids started piling off the bus.
"Ho-dee-doh, nothing to see here, move along, move along!"
Thanks for asking about HG + PG approaches George. To be honest, sync'ing the approach pattern has never been an issue for me when both types of wings are in the air. It might be different at sites with large numbers of both, landing at the same time.... But thus far, I've never been concerned at our local sites. Perhaps the difference in speeds/performance is a help in that regard.
But where I *have* had an occasional issue is within the LZ itself. We hangies need **WAY** more space, so if a PG pilot is taking time to pack things up in the middle of the field, then that can really cause problems. Might be hard to believe, but this is true even in the bridge field, which is super-huge.
The problem is that the HGers have to set up their final and start burning it in. Sometimes the landing is as expected, and the wing is on the ground in the middle of the field. Other times you hit wicked gradient, and end up much shorter than expected. Other times, you hit multiple bubbles of lift, and end up on the ground much further than planned.
I know that these very same effects are also in play for PG pilots, but (from what I've seen thus far), the approach angle on final is much steeper & the speeds are much slower. Hence, the landing 'radius' is much less than for the HGers.
Bottom line : If it's possible to gather the lines, do an initial shake-out, pull in the canopy, and then move to the side.... Now THAT can
really make a difference!!
We do the same sort of thing, hustling the wing out of the way, sometimes at a darn good clip if there's another pilot right behind. But obviously it's a bit easier for us, no worries about snags/debris/etc.
MarkC